Interment Ceremony
Thursday, October 16, 2025
Starts at 9:00 am (Central time)
only 15 minutes
followed by gathering at
Fort Snelling National Park
Shelter A
for all who care to join us
Cultural Diversity Human Rights - Thoughts for Equality and Action
Thursday, October 16, 2025
Starts at 9:00 am (Central time)
only 15 minutes
followed by gathering at
Fort Snelling National Park
Shelter A
for all who care to join us
Mythology and Its Injustice to Immigration by Sam Hernandez March 2020
Part 3
Myth number 3: Today’s immigrants do not want to learn English. It is not true.
History shows that today’s non-white immigrants learn English slightly faster than the first white European immigrants who quit coming when the conditions in their home country improved.
The English came first, as colonized people of the British Empire, and succeeded in establishing “first power” and way of life in the first colonies. They instituted English as the present and future primary language. As other white European nations came, the colonies became populated with enclaves of white groups more comfortable in their own native culture and language, trying to retain their “self” while in transition to a new language and culture being built by the British elite and trade ship companies. It took them a long time to learn English, partly because they were starting their own businesses and work within themselves while trying to remain their own ethnic selves. Still, they were all white and European. They were no longer indentured and liked to see hard physical labor done by “others.” They were proud that they had eliminated the “inferior” Native Americans and embraced a legalized slavery in the South. Winning the Revolutionary War proved that they were white, proud and privileged, and had “melted” into “the pot” of one culture--all white.
Keeping one’s native culture, or not, does not seem to slow or speed up learning English. English is today’s most needed language for global trade and business. It still takes time to learn it. Everybody who came and now come to the U.S. wants and needs to learn English in order to live, work, and communicate with everyone. Then and now, the elders take about a generation (20-25 years) to learn English. The children and youth learn quicker because school is part of their day. The second generation becomes more English proficient. The third generation begins to even forget their first language as they “melt into the pot.” Some continue to try even after they find out they are not “meltable.” Learning English while living in enclaves and working daily is very difficult. For example, German immigration peaked in the 1860-1870’s. Three generations later, during the WWI period of 1917, there were still 700 German language newspapers available! Language is the essence and retainer of an ethnic culture. If you are not white, it is best to keep your language.
Learning English is a most serious undertaking. Are you learning English in the U.S. just because you need it to survive? To forget your native language and assimilate into a white non-ethnic “melting pot” culture where you find your ethnicity is “non-meltable” because of your color? To become bi- or multi-cultural so that you can live and work with different cultures and still be “you”?
The whites came already having had experience with elements of the start of the Industrial Revolution and wanted it here. To get it done, all white groups decided to forgo their similar ethnic cultures and accept one language. They had to forgo their family-extension systems in order to direct more of their time to the revolution of mechanized production and profitable labor. They became a “nuclear” family, responsible for only the parents and siblings. Other values were given up for those needed for success in the new non-ethnic “culture of the machine”: cyberculture. For example, they went from group to individual, from relationship orientation to task orientation, from cooperation to competition, and from “to be” to “to do.” It got them what they wanted--to become the most productive and richest nation in the world. It also made most of them white nationalists and racists. When non-whites do what it takes to “melt”, they are told that they have to do “one more thing” that they didn’t have to do: change their color. The “unmeltable” non-whites decide to either live on belonging neither to their original group nor to cyberculture; to become culture “floaters “or return to their former “selves”, remain or become bilingual, and have one group in which they can have equality. They often become mentors to the continually arriving non-English-dominant relatives who need their love, hope and direction.
Cyberculture has capitalism, nationalism and kleptocracy. Its inequities are hard on family extended or nuclear systems. Nuclear family is breaking down. Fragile families crumble into single-parent homes. Children are being raised by other than their parents. Seniors find their final years are often alone. The social ills of drugs, loneliness, poverty, depression and suicide keep rising. In 1960, 78% of the U.S. children lived in nuclear families. Today it is 48%. Many are directionless and ill-disciplined at home and in school. The world is in such turmoil that immigration will continue and most of them will be non-white. As always, they are needed.
Mythology and Its Injustice to Immigration-Part 2 by Sam Hernandez February 2020
Part 1 was published in *November 2019, and covered Myth 1: Most of the immigrants are here illegally. Not true.
The mythology that will be covered in Part 2 is: It is as easy now to enter into this country as it was when European immigrants first entered in the beginning of the 17 th century (1607). That is far from true. Before responding to that, the statement causes me to respond to a couple of other misconceptions.
U.S. History is filled with errors, misnomers and sins of omission. Readers are led to believe that the whites who arrived at Jamestown were the first non-natives to settle in lands that are now the U.S.A. (1607). That is incorrect. In what is now Florida (land of flowers), the Spanish had officially settled the town of St. Augustine in 8 September of 1565. The Spanish had entered what is now Arizona and New Mexico in 1540, 67 years before Jamestown. They had Santa Fe as a thriving settlement about the time Jamestown was struggling. The landowners were Spanish but the majority of the land workers were “mestizos”--Mexicans that were part original “Indians” and now also Spanish. Many of their ancestors had long lived in the Southwest as full-fleshed Native Americans before becoming mixed-blood. This status puts to question if they are “Mexican American” or just “Americans-from-Mexico” and/or if they are “immigrants” in the way we perceive them to be. Since they were “Americans” before the Anglos in the Eastern seaboard and history shows the U.S. quite unjustly took Texas and then today’s Southwest from them--it might be more fair and just to give them more opportunity to immigrate and become U.S. citizens than the other current contemporary immigrants that are coming and not born in the U.S. It would be fairer, more humane and more reparative in nature. Today’s international law would not allow the way the U.S. exploitively and militantly took over indigent people, land and resources. The U.S. has continued to exploit other “American” Latino nations of Latin America, mostly from Central America via regime-change tactics. They should also be given "reparation" consideration via their current desperate immigration to the U.S.
Now, as to Myth #2, immigration was easy only at the outset. The New World was open. There were no rules, regulations or opposition. The natives were migratory and moved with their portable homes to wherever the animals they hunted would go. The lands were virginal in the way our national parks are today. Their concept of land was the belief that no one could own it. It was there for all. It was when they discovered that whites believed land could be bought and owned and they would lose their hunting grounds and their way of life that wars started from the Atlantic to the Pacific. They observed that white’s attitude and behavior showed dislike, hate and racism due to their non-whiteness and way of life. They treated them as if they were slaves and tried to make them Christians.
From 1607 to the middle of the 18 th century, the greatest challenge to the European immigrants was just getting here. Most of them were destitute and came as indentured servants until they could pay back for their voyage. By the time they settled California they were mostly white nationalists and started to bar the entry of the Chinese. From there on the rules for entry have become harsh, cruel and racist. Today, a wall is being built at our southern border and thousands are being camped by Mexico awaiting rigged processes to enter the U.S. Often, children are separated from their parents and may never be united again.
Among the many immigration entry rules are the proof that you can be self-sufficient and trained in a field that needs you and are sponsored by your to-be employer. Many of our ancestors who came after 1790 would not have been allowed in!
This issue of unjust immigration, in need of dire reform, is not being taken up by any of the remaining candidates running for President. There should be a movement called “Immigrant Lives Matter” with chapters in the key U.S. cities and states. They should be led by trained, charismatic and dedicated Latino leaders. We currently do not have such leaders in the nation like we did during the Chicano Movement (Cesar Chavez, Corky Gonzalez and Lopez Reis Tijerina). A leader must have followers. Recent research showed that we do not have a single national Latino leader (the closest potential one we have is Senator Ted Cruz)! It might be Julian Castro. The dynamic, dedicated local leader I know, with committed active followers, is Adriana Cerrillo from Minneapolis.
It is quite clear that we need more leaders at local, state and national levels. Let’s get organized and struggle together!
*published here January 8, 2020